In the automatic washing of medical devices, it is often taken for granted that a cycle completed without errors is, in itself, a guarantee of effectiveness.<\/p>\n\n
In reality, this is not the case.<\/p>\n\n
To verify process effectiveness and confirm its declared performance, a washer-disinfector must comply with two fundamental phases that form the basis of process control, traceability and risk prevention.<\/p>\n\n
Monitoring consists of the continuous analysis of process parameters during every cycle. It is the daily activity that answers a fundamental question: <\/p>\n\n
“Did the completed cycle comply with the defined parameters?”<\/p>\n\n
Modern washer-disinfectors make this information available through electronic records, while supervision systems such as AT-Vision by AT-OS enable the collection and centralization of these data, facilitating cycle control and the status monitoring of washer-disinfectors.<\/p>\n\n
The objective is simple: to immediately identify any deviation from the expected process before it can turn into an operational issue.<\/p>\n\n
Monitoring checks the individual cycle.<\/p>\n\n
Validation, on the other hand, verifies that the entire process is actually capable of delivering the expected result.<\/p>\n\n
It therefore answers a different question:<\/p>\n\n
“Is this washer-disinfector, installed in this operating environment and used under these conditions, actually capable of cleaning and disinfecting medical devices correctly?”<\/em><\/p>\n\n It is a periodic technical activity, essential for confirming the maintenance of the expected performance.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n Validation must be carried out during initial installation, after significant technical interventions and periodically thereafter, at a frequency defined according to the criticality of the operating environment.
\n
\n<\/p>\n\n Many critical issues are not immediately visible, even when the cycle ends without errors. For example:<\/p>\n\n Validation is precisely what makes it possible to identify these issues before they affect process safety.<\/p>\n\n Cycle compliance does not always coincide with process effectiveness: only independent verification can demonstrate that the process is actually performing as intended.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n Monitoring and validation are not simply documentation requirements, but essential tools for managing the reprocessing process.<\/p>\n\n In other words, they transform control from a reactive activity into a preventive tool.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" In the automatic washing of medical devices, it is often taken for granted that a cycle completed without errors is, in itself, a guarantee of effectiveness. In reality, this is not the case. To verify process effectiveness and confirm its declared performance, a washer-disinfector must comply with two fundamental phases that form the basis of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":2915,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[424],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4405","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-products"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n\n
To scientifically validate a process, it is not enough to rely on the machine display; external verification tools must also be used:<\/h3>\n\n
\n
What can go wrong?<\/h2>\n\n
\n
\n
The value of process control for the organization<\/h2>\n\n
A properly monitored and validated system enables organizations to:<\/h3>\n\n
\n